Bitcoin was copyrighted from whitepaper and code version 0.1
A copyright can be maintained under a pseudonym.
And I've shown you a copyright registration from someone else from 3 years ago, exactly the same as CSW's one, claiming the exact same thing that CSW is claiming. What is it exactly that makes the other one false but CSW's true, considering they have both presented the
exact same amount of corroborating evidence - i.e. none at all?