How do you feel about the idea of statutes of limitations on plagiarism cases? I think punishing somebody for a one-off offense done years ago (talking like 3 or more years ago) is a bit too stringent and the current plagiabot running around is a bit out of hand, leading to the banning of people for a mistake committed in 2014. Maybe the query or the rule should be tightened a bit. Just my opinion.
Glad to see theymos's action here. It does show that there are still people looking over cases and reviewing the circumstances; much to the dismay of most of the complaints out there. The rest is for the "Trust" network to sort out for itself.
I don't agree with easing up on what the Bot is searching. If someone made the one mistake years ago, then they are receiving leniency, we've seen it for so many people now. If it's happening now instead of 4 or 5 years ago, probably better for them; as it's not a permaban. Had it happened then they would be Ban evading and there is no case for them to complain if they get caught. Anyone receiving these bans should just serve the time and wear the signature with gratitude, for their second chance.
Edit: I said this elsewhere and sums up my feelings fairly well.
~snip~
For me personally this situation shows poor judgement on their part, but needs to be reviewed based on each case. If they have anything less than this reaction:
I have no problem with my Im an idiot and fckd up banner. Id have accepted much worse. I deserve it, and so does anyone else who had or will be issued one. We all make mistakes in life, its about acknowledging them, getting back up, correcting your mistakes, moving on, and doing better.
~snip~