⭐ Merited by Lafu (1)
Dear hilariousandco, in light of the evidence you've presented,
I'll have to ask you to lift the ban on Acura3600 immediately and also waive the signature ban.
Considering the post you've presented as evidence for plagiarism in this case, I come to the conclusion that the defendant is innocent as charged
You're obviously missing the most important clue here, which I've highlighted for your convenience:
Ja, da hast du irgendwie Recht. Wenn ich ihm deutlich mehr Durchhaltevermögen bei seinen einzelnen Projekten Zutrauen würde würde ich mit Sicherheit in Wave investieren.
Hat irgendwer eine info wie das IPO ablaufen soll?
WAVES ICO STRUCTURE AND TIMELINE
[... full ANN copy pasted ...]
(translation: Does anyone have any info on how the IPO will be run?)
One user, Jl777, asked for information on how some specific IPO/ICO will be run.
Acura3600 answered by copy-pasting the relevant content of the ANN-post.
That is definitely not plagiarism, because there's no intention to make the content "his own".
He simply "forgot" to declare the source, which was, in this particular case, self-evident, by the way.
If we were in a discussion about the right to bear arms in the US, and I were to post the words
A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.
you wouldn't consider that a case of plagiarism, would you?
The source is obvious.
It's also obvious that this is not content produced by Acura3600.
Therefore, I consider it a necessity to lift the ban on Acura3600 immediately and also waive the signature ban.
I'll have to ask you to lift the ban on Acura3600 immediately and also waive the signature ban.
I changed it to a 60 day ban and one year sig ban. This is the post you were seemingly banned for:
I have to say I don't agree even with that "minor" sentence and a 1-year parole.Considering the post you've presented as evidence for plagiarism in this case, I come to the conclusion that the defendant is innocent as charged
You're obviously missing the most important clue here, which I've highlighted for your convenience:
Jl777 hat bisher nur jede Menge Projekte begonnen, aber noch nie eines zu Ende, geschweige denn zum Erfolg gebracht.
Ja, da hast du irgendwie Recht. Wenn ich ihm deutlich mehr Durchhaltevermögen bei seinen einzelnen Projekten Zutrauen würde würde ich mit Sicherheit in Wave investieren.
Hat irgendwer eine info wie das IPO ablaufen soll?
[... full ANN copy pasted ...]
One user, Jl777, asked for information on how some specific IPO/ICO will be run.
Acura3600 answered by copy-pasting the relevant content of the ANN-post.
That is definitely not plagiarism, because there's no intention to make the content "his own".
He simply "forgot" to declare the source, which was, in this particular case, self-evident, by the way.
If we were in a discussion about the right to bear arms in the US, and I were to post the words
A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.
you wouldn't consider that a case of plagiarism, would you?
The source is obvious.
It's also obvious that this is not content produced by Acura3600.
Therefore, I consider it a necessity to lift the ban on Acura3600 immediately and also waive the signature ban.