It costs nothing to add the source and/or quote tags and remove any doubt. Here is a another one, unprompted spammy copy-pasta (and no, the link at the bottom is not a link to a source):
This is a slightly different case, but the original source does not seem to be yurimir, but rather the video description by Trade Crypto Live itself?Good informational video - Komodo, just another crypto or better than Bitcoin?
[...]
[...]
Good informational video - Komodo, just another crypto or better than Bitcoin?
[...]
[...]
In which case I would argue that this could potentially be considered plagiarism, but that would at least be stretching the meaning of the word.
After all, it's just the "titled" time stamps of the video, which are, in fact, provided by the linked source for the original content.
This might be enough for a signature ban, but I personally would consider that too harsh.
edit: fixed the source link etc.
edit2: highlighted the important part where you, suchmoon, are wrong
edit3: screenshot of the linked source, showing the copied timestamps:
