1. So? Bill Gator openly admitted he bought the account himself, he wasn't caught doing something shady by a 3rd party.
Right, so the exchange took place, that's why its different. He also bought it from a professional account seller and not from the original owner.
2. Yes, and we are forced to take your word for this aren't we?
3. See number 2.
Your "proof" is nothing of the sort. If in fact your account was sold there is absolutely no reason all of this additional information could not be transferred along with it.
Just put aside your grudges and think rationally for a moment:
If I would go through all that trouble to sell my account, transferring over control of several coin addresses and an email address, so nobody could/would notice that it had been sold, why on earth would I attempt to sell it under my own name?
I know at heart you're a conspiracy theorist and nothings going to stop you from holding some pretty wacky beliefs, but to anybody capable of entertaining a rational, unbiased thought, the discernible evidence at hand points to me still being the original owner.
I see, forgiveness for thee, but not for Bill Gator in this case eh? Thanks for demonstrating the hypocrisy of tagging Bill and not you even more completely. Keep that brown on your nose, its good luck.
Once again, you walk away having learned nothing and doubling down on your own arrogance -- a tactic which has yielded nothing but unfavorable results for you in the past. I just explained to you the difference, for the 5th time. There's nothing hypocritical about it at all. There is only your inability to think rationally.