I am personally against the tagging of accounts for old offenses, including bill's. However, not all others feel the same way.
The problem is that almost every single person that has tagged me for buying bill gator have refused to tag nutildah (you) for attempting to sell a legendary account, with trust long after my "offense". They are refusing to treat iluvbitcoins case, blazed, even marlboroza's with the same principles. These "others" feel however is most convenient and try to wrap it up in concepts they will throwaway and belittle when the next situation arises.
Without having a consistent criteria for tagging these accounts we'll just keep running in circles of no accountability until the hypocrisy is even more egregious.
If the rule was that anyone involved in account buying/selling ever is to be tagged by at least half a dozen DT, then I wouldn't have anything to say.
I was honestly trying to remove myself from the drama.
Bill, the difference between you and me is you bought your account, and I didn't. We do not fall in the same category there.
Did you honestly believe nobody was going to tag you the moment you said you bought your account? Really you should be thankful for being the recipient of a special theymos intervention that has apparently allowed you to remain in your signature campaign.
Theymos' decision is the first of its kind I've ever seen, so consider yourself lucky to be part of special treatment enjoyed by less that 0.1% of the forum.