Re: Hhampuz embezzling signature campaign funds from BestMixer

Quote from: Lauda on May 27, 2019, 10:47:19 PM

Quote from: Quickseller on May 27, 2019, 10:45:12 PM

Lauda thinks he can defend Hhampuz from having to respond by countering any negative rating he receives, and I would be unsurprised to see others do this too. Any countered rating will not change the underlying facts, which speak for themselves.

I hereby also forbid Hhampuz to respond. How about that? What will you do now? Roll Eyes

This would be evidence that hhampuz is little more than a puppet of yours, which has been evident as of recently.

Regardless of the underlying reason why Hhampuz does not respond, the facts continue speaking for themselves.

Quote from: petahasher on May 27, 2019, 10:49:06 PM

I am not against Lauda/for you. Read my post above, brushing off accusations because the accuser is not trustworthy is a dangerous and damaging mindset.

I made it clear that I'm not defending you, because obviously I don't want nor deserve negative trust.

I agree that what you describe is a dangerous mindset, and that you are not for/against any person.

I don't think not being for/against someone is enough to avoid getting the negative rating.