Being stricter I now see "Risked BTC" is how much I could have lost, and since I personally wouldn't have lost anything in this case it seems I was wrong about that. Is that right?
I tend to believe that theymos somehow picked the wrong words here, it does not make sense for it to be about only what 'YOU' would have lost, because if it was true, then one can only leave a feedback for members whom they have personally traded with, which is not the case.
in other words, the proper explanation of the risked
BTC would be "How much could the member steal / how much they stole"
so as far as your rating on OG goes, i see it as perfectly fit, because technically OG could have ran away with 500
BTC and he did not, does not matter who's
BTC is that.