Why do you need to do an STO instead of ITO if the value comes just from the token buybacks? Is the token really considered to be on STO?
*snip*
Although BHF token holders do not have any voting rights, each BHF token has the rights to (0.00000004%) co-ownership of Blue Hill Mine. Once BHF tokens are exchanged for the fully Swiss regulated BHM tokens, you will be part owner of the Blue Hill Mine, which is digital asset-backed "programmable ownership". Additional benefits is that Blue Hill Mining aims to create sustainable growth by continuously building up a portfolio of additional mining projects similar to Blue Hill Mine, using part of the profits generated from the future Blue Hill Platform* and sale of the raw material to the market. The balance of the profits will also be used to buy tokens back from the crypto exchange and these purchased tokens will be burned and removed from circulation, in order to secure a strong market value (the fewer tokens available, the more they are worth).
*snip*
Right, STO it is, that would have been enough to clear it up.

And technically if it wasn't and i wanted to nitpick it would have been an ITO, and not an ICO since you are a token and not making a coin. But who cares.