Thank you so much for digging that up. It was a person promoting a scam so there is that, but if anyone wants to exclude me for it - I'm a big fan of informed decisions so feel free, I certainly wouldn't have a meltdown over this. Some other things to look for in my post history:
- I may have said favorable things about a site or two that later turned out to be scams.
- I've said many many NSFW and plain mean things to pretty much everyone I came into contact with.
- I've been wrong quite a few times and - gasp - may have failed to admit it once or twice.
- I don't like lemons.
Not a comprehensive list of all wrongdoings but should get you started.
Even the people who exclude me don't bother to argue I am a thief. Keep proving how unbiased you are by comparing me to known scammers to argue your extremely weak justification for punitive punishment.
If you were a thief you would have red trust. As it stands, it's your
judgement that is questionable. Your attempts to paint this as being called a scammer show that you either don't understand how the trust system works, or deliberately make yourself look like a victim, neither of which does you any favors as far as your trust inclusions are concerned.