Again, when was the source added?
Sorry, I don't know what you mean? Told you already before. Please be more specific.
From the start, I am fully honest and specific with you and I ask you for this same.
If you ask some questions please be specific, I don't understand your mind shortcuts. Additionally, multiple times when you quoted my posts you chose only the worst sentences.
Please, be honest, like me and if you quote some examples, quotes or show evidence, do it properly and show how it really looks like and not with cut out of context sentences because this doesn't reflect the truth at all.
If this is a trial then it should be honest from both sides. Or maybe this is something different?
I've been watching this thread from the beginning, and to be honest I want to believe wwzsocki. He's not a spammer, he doesn't come off like an account farmer, he contributes to the forum, and all in all I think he's an asset to the German and Polish boards, and the forum community as a whole.
As a testament to his character; look how he's handled these allegations: He's remained calm, not made any personal attacks against his accusers, taken all the criticism for what it's worth, answered the questions asked, and hasn't lost his composure.
His explanation even seems plausible. I could see myself using one of my addresses to help out my brother, or a friend (who I've been trying to introduce to crypto) just the help them get started while they are still learning. The only trouble with his excuse is that many many bounty spamming shitbirds have exhausted it as an excuse. But wwzsocki isn't exactly a bounty spamming shitbird, now is he?
I don't see any reason not to believe him, and in the big picture, what has he really done to deserve all these red tags? Theymos himself suggested that giving red-tags for merit abuse isn't a great use of the trust system (I'm paraphrasing because I'm at work and I don't have time to dig for the exact quote.) Since I see no legitimate reason not to believe him I am leaning towards giving him the benefit of the doubt.
I would much rather see a guy who is suspected of merit abuse go free rather than see an innocent dude labeled with these tags. Yeah, I see the amount of merit cycling between the two accounts, and it does seem excessive. The use of the same address is also suspicious but not incriminating.
Now all of you folks that gave wwzsocki and Crypto Mania neg-tags are welcome to use the trust system anyway you choose. That's what it's there for. But please do consider your actions and their ramifications. wwzsocki has just been kicked off his sig campaign, and I can only assume that it was due to this accusation and the related tags.
For that reason alone, I hope I'm wrong and you guys are right. It would really suck if you guys are wrong and he still lost his spot on that campaign.
Thank you @DireWolf, this means a lot to me.