I think anyone can understand that when i say it's to the casino's benefit to change the server seed,
I think anyone can see that have answered that many times and you still just keep repeating yourself without addressing my points. All you have done is repeat your opinions and failed to answer why using an algorithm on a provably fair site wouldn't leave them open to being exploited, failed to provide any proof that people lose less on sites with static seeds and failed to bring a single piece of evidence that backs up your assertions.
It doesn't matter how much the player bet next time,
Of course it matters. If someone was player against an algorithm they would bet small until they knew the next result was going force them to lose, then they would bet max win on the opposite result. Unlike a non-provably fair casino the result is decided the moment they click roll and it can't be changed with out that being provable.
Plus in this case only the client seed is known, there can be countless server seeds that will make the number locate in a specific region, so it's almost impossible to guess what the next server seed will be.
Of course it impossible to guess the next server seed as you only have the hash. It is also impossible in a static system unless you've cracked SHA256 in which case you wouldn't be wasting your time exploiting a casino.
It is also impossible for us to know if you change your client seed or not and guessing that would leave us open to being exploited.
You better understand more about provably fair that you keep talking about every time before you post your stupid point of view.
I'll leave the readers to decide which of our opinions is stupid.