Hi Bitcointalk community!
A little more than 7 months ago, I created and lead a topic: ⭐ Forum chronicle - UP Rank List - Congratulations! (BPIP Merit stat, Trust) ⭐
Lately I've noticed that the limit activity honoured prevents users to obtain a new rank. For example:
Both users have more than 1000 Merit, more than 900 Activities, but still remain Hero Member's. Maybe it's time to change the ranking system a bit?
As of may 31, 2109, we have such a system of ranks:
When introduced this system of raising the rank on activity, about the likely Merit even one more thought. But in January 2018, Merit appeared and the system of ranks where activity plays a major role and hinders the development of especially honored users is somewhat outdated. I propose to revise the ranking system and lower the minimum activity for higher ranks. This will contribute to the fact that especially honored users will receive ranks faster and it will motivate all users to write high-quality posts, rather than stuffing activity.
My proposal:
Comments, corrections, suggestions, additions as usual accepted and welcome!
A little more than 7 months ago, I created and lead a topic: ⭐ Forum chronicle - UP Rank List - Congratulations! (BPIP Merit stat, Trust) ⭐
Lately I've noticed that the limit activity honoured prevents users to obtain a new rank. For example:
| User name | Merit Now | Activity | Rank | ||||
| Pmalek | 1040 | 952 | Hero Member | ||||
| bob123 | 1031 | 910 | Hero Member |
Both users have more than 1000 Merit, more than 900 Activities, but still remain Hero Member's. Maybe it's time to change the ranking system a bit?
As of may 31, 2109, we have such a system of ranks:
Quote
Rank | Description | Tag | Required merit | |
| Brand New: | 0 posts, gets 1 gold coin under his name. |  | 0 | |
| Newbie: | (none), gets 1 gold coin under his name. | | 0 | |
| Jr. Member: | Activity: 30, gets 1 gold coin under his name. | | 1 | |
| Member: | Activity: 60, gets 2 gold coins under his name. | | 10 | |
| Full Member: | Activity: 120, gets 3 gold coins under his name. | | 100 | |
| Sr. Member: | Activity: 240, gets 4 gold coins under his name. | | 250 | |
| Hero Member: | Activity: 480, gets 5 gold coins under his name. | | 500 | |
| Legendary: | Activity: 775-1030, gets 5 gold coins under his name of which the last is half dark blue. |  | 1000 |
When introduced this system of raising the rank on activity, about the likely Merit even one more thought. But in January 2018, Merit appeared and the system of ranks where activity plays a major role and hinders the development of especially honored users is somewhat outdated. I propose to revise the ranking system and lower the minimum activity for higher ranks. This will contribute to the fact that especially honored users will receive ranks faster and it will motivate all users to write high-quality posts, rather than stuffing activity.
My proposal:
Rank | Description | Tag | Required merit | |
| Brand New: | 0 posts, gets 1 gold coin under his name. | | 0 | |
| Newbie: | (none), gets 1 gold coin under his name. | | 0 | |
| Jr. Member: | Activity: 25, gets 1 gold coin under his name. | | 1 | |
| Member: | Activity: 50, gets 2 gold coins under his name. | | 10 | |
| Full Member: | Activity: 100, gets 3 gold coins under his name. | | 100 | |
| Sr. Member: | Activity: 200, gets 4 gold coins under his name. | | 250 | |
| Hero Member: | Activity: 400, gets 5 gold coins under his name. | | 500 | |
| Legendary: | Activity: 600, gets 5 gold coins under his name of which the last is half dark blue. | | 1000 | |
| Self-Made Legendary: | Activity: 800, gets 5 gold coins under his name of which the last is half DarkTurquoise(For example) |  | 2000 |
Comments, corrections, suggestions, additions as usual accepted and welcome!