Well staff agreed you were abusing the trust system and excluded you as a result. I would say that is pretty solid substantiation.

Your argument now is that I didn't substantiate, that you didn't substantiate your claims? Do you put your brain into a blender every morning to get this kind of flawless logic? My lies can be substantiated right now! All you have to do is quote what I lied about in your original rating. Prove me wrong. In this case, proving a negative is not possible, and this is the only way you can "win" an argument is by setting an impossible standard. You enjoy your semantic gymnastics though and pretend what you are saying makes any sense if you like. Anyone with basic abilities for simple logic can see what you are doing here.

Your mentally ill clown dance of distraction and confusion is evident to see for anyone who bothers to read this thread where you spend about a dozen pages in a desperate attempt to distract from your inability to substantiate your claims.