This Mr. Has more merit than couple hundreds of legendary members combined, a DT member and most importantly has no enemies on forum and has been always helpful and constructive aside from sometime enjoying the drama on Meta as everyone here does  

But all of the above is irrevlent to the subject in hand, one does not need a master degree  in Bitcointalk to know bullshit when they see it.

Simple logic states that at least one of the statements you stated are wrong, you reffered to staff action as a "very solid substantiation" , but in your signature you reffer to their action as the total opposite, now there are only three possibilities.

1- your claim about the staff action  removing Vod as " substantiation" is wrong

2-your claim about the staff in your signature is wrong

3-both claims are wrong.

You can't be "selective" in describing someone's action, they are either accurate or not.

So pick one of the above / answer the question, or go for a more convenient option which is  "attacking" me.