Or simple, campaign managers should stop counting post made in DT/feedbacks drama threads but are this guys creating this topics because they're paid to via signature? I doubt so.
No, I highly doubt anyone is creating DT/trust/merit/whatever drama threads just to crank out posts for signature campaigns. Nor do I think the people involved in or who are even discussing the drama in these threads are doing so in order to increase their post counts. I can speak for myself only, of course, but they're some of the most interesting threads around, and in so far as I'm on DT and know a little bit about some of the players, I do have opinions to add to some of these threads.
As far as campaign managers not counting posts in threads related to such drama, I doubt that's going to happen. Are there even that many sig campaigns left? I haven't looked at the services section in a long time, and I have signatures blocked.
The DT system on bitcointalk is not about warning newbies,
It is about tainting any user that dares to have an opinion separate from Lauda & Theymos & gang.
Not true. You are making the mistake I've seen so many people make around here, which is to lump all the DT members and their ratings into Lauda's. Not every DT member agrees with all of Lauda's feedback or with each other's for that matter. Infighting is not unknown within the DT list, you know.