Several 0 payments in that list, is this to be expected?
Yes. They were not paid in the superblock.
I'd be curious to see the ins/outs of this process. is there a minimum point requirement?
No. This is a number scaling issue. To do that, import the data into excel and just reverse engineer it, and ensure the payments below .25BBP end up as zero.
We do require a .25BBP minimum to be in a superblock vout (for compactness).
Rob:
https://chainz.cryptoid.info/bbp/tx.dws?84be7fd5edaa0ac65a40075a35b84a81cf9fea01ee2c21f2ea4333a69276c02e.htmThese #'s don't match what you had on your chart, and it sent a few 0.00 BBP transactions this seems strange to me.
Could be a timing issue (report output vs what happened) but it's curious
The first part of this is easy; I pasted the last leaderboard (as this morning I assumed we were dealing with the last one), but in reality, we have to subtract 205 from the block height, so I really should have posted this one:
leaderboard false 123430
(Sorry)
Now the 19 recipients match (Note that the amounts don't match leaderboard exactly only because of the way the contract creator multiplies the budget - we can correct leaderboard to match asap).
However, the zeroes are kind of interesting. I see the two zero payments.
Looking at the code, we clearly do not reward people for less than .25BBP in rewards. I'll look at that in-depth next.
As I'd rather not have a lot of spam in there when we have 1000 recips.
(Or have 0 payments in the superblock).
EDIT: The 0 payments will be fixed in next release- fixed.
EDIT: It looks like the payments will match to the penny in the next release (for easier debugging).