It's really funny to see someone who bought an account and then sending negative feedback to possibly bought accounts. It even took a ban for you to finally admit.
I gave negative feedback to accounts that I felt were at high risk of being used for taking advantage of their status or reputation to scam by their new owners, and I will remain by those feedbacks even now. Yes, I played judge and jury and executioner with my subjective view, but your oversimplified statement overlooks the fact that this account was either a Jr. Member or a Member (can't remember) when I acquired possession of it and it had no trust feedback whatsoever - nothing like the accounts I chose to tag.
See, I trust bitcoin revo based on our interactions, which is why I left him positive trust--and I still trust him, despite the fact that he bought the account. There's no official statute of limitations as far as tagging people for account dealing, but what he did is far in the past IMO.
18.28 + 80 = 98.28 $ Average cost of legendary account is about (as i know) 1000-2000 dollars for now.
Yep, trustworthy, without a doubt.
You might be referring to the basis of trust that The Pharmacist has for me, but it sounds like you're trying to derail my "trustworthiness" to 98 dollars and 28 cents so I'll ask you to scan through the rest of my trades as well. It may not compare to full-time traders here, but it still exceeds the amount that you posted - if that's any scale to how trustworthy one may be, which isn't. There are other factors such as timeliness, reliability, etc etc which I hope I exemplified to The Pharmacist during my interactions with him here, of whom will likely be taking those other factors into consideration.
I'm starting to really hate this can of worms that theymos decided to open for bill gator. So now every asshole will be able to weasel out of a ban with some whining and helpful hints from an account farmer/trader? And why should this one get a temp ban? Just unban him altogether and give him back his signature, he's got a perfect alibi 
Speaking of bill, I don't recall him bringing the real plagiarizer (the person who sold him the account) to justice. Should be the minimum requirement for getting any kind of lenience on the grounds of an account purchase. Just shows how those account buyers don't really care much beyond their signature spam.
Speaking of bill, I don't recall him bringing the real plagiarizer (the person who sold him the account) to justice. Should be the minimum requirement for getting any kind of lenience on the grounds of an account purchase. Just shows how those account buyers don't really care much beyond their signature spam.
As biased as I am on this case, I get it. I do. Seeing a shit ton of people using this excuse and knowing that some of them may just be using it as a deceptive second chance at spamming for a few extra coins is infuriating, and there needs to be more thought put into this so that this isn't used as precedent for one of those fake cases to succeed in the future as well. However, I do ask that context is considered and I'm not grouped together in with yobit spammers or trust abusers that take advantage of account prestige.