Correlation does not mean causation. A Google search for "Richard Stallman" porn returns 290,000 results, none of which stars Richard as the porn star. According to your logic, it should be about twice as likely that Richard is a porn star than that he is Satoshi.
Surely, you don't think that I didn't know that. Hence the question. With so many results, where do should we start?
You already knew "Richard Stallman" porn returns 290,000 results?
P.S.
Just trolling with you. No suggestion intended.
Well todu apparently checked every one of those results for a guest appearance from RMS
.