What part of the game theory and economics is your pea-sized brain incapable of understanding?
I pointed out that after the fork off, Legacy address hodlers will have tokens in both forks and the Core address hodlers will only have Core shitcoins. So Core supporters will have no Legacy coins to sell. And Legacy supporters will have Core shitcoins to dump. Why would they instead dump their real BTC if they made the conscious decision to hodl in legacy addresses.
You are delusional. "Legacy address holders" =/= your shitcoin supporters. Nobody gives a shit about your obscure shitcoin hard fork where miners steal everything. You and your little ragtag crew of neckbeards in your mom's basement may care about your fork, but no one else will. That's why only a handful of people are even aware of your delusional ideas.
There are lots and lots of
Bitcoin supporters with legacy outputs who will dump your shitcoin to hell. Just because some people are holding Segwit outputs doesn't mean legacy address holders unanimously support miners stealing half of all Bitcoin outputs. LOL.
What is this bullshit about "conscious decisions?" Nobody made a conscious decision to support your obscure little shitcoin. People keep their coins where they do for a multitude of reasons.....convenience, laziness, cold storage hodling, lost coins, etc. What evidence do you have that any sizeable economic group has any interest in supporting your hard forked spinoff shitcoin?
The miners are not going to steal anyones coins. Only those generous snowflakes (like you fool) who have at the time of the fork spent their coins to anyone can spend addresses at the time of the fork off, will be thanked for funding the immutability of Satoshis protocol.
Right right right. Cool story. Miners aren't stealing anything. They're just "taking" half of all
BTC hard forked shitcoins for themselves.
"Blah blah blah, bow down to Satoshi's immutable protocol herp derp." You neckbeard retards sound like a fucking cult.
You idiots haven't even bothered to discuss mining incentives as pertaining to actual users, post-fork.
I already refuted this in the prior post. You seem to not understand the importance of the power-law distribution of wealth and thus you do not understand economics.
You didn't refute anything. You in no way related that to
market demand for your shitcoin. Why the fuck would
anyone ever adopt your hard fork shitcoin?
You repeating your bizarre fantasies in an authoritative manner over and over and peppering in conspiracy theory jargon doesn't make you convincing. It just makes you look like a bizarre fucking cultist/conspiracy nut. You bring zero compelling game theory to the table.
You've based this entire absurd theory on mining rewards at existing prices! That's beyond absurd! Miners on your shitcoin won't be mining billions in value. Who is going to put bids on exchanges for that shitcoin? It would be dumped to hell immediately and become incredibly unprofitable to mine.
You are so arrogant that you refuse to learn about the backtested model that gives Bitcoin its valuation. Thus youre boastfully ignorant about what the real
BTC is worth. Fuck exchanges and all your nonsense about what you think gives Bitcoin value. Go study the math of the backtested model which I linked for you, so you can put some salve on your eyes, fool.
It's insulting how fucking stupid you are. I can't believe you got some people in here to take you seriously.
You can't "backtest" for value you fucking moron. Value is subjective. There are literally millions of variables that can affect supply and demand hence why economics is not scientific and your retarded theory is not provable. Your absurd projections are the work of a mentally ill child. The fact that you think value could even be studied in this way really shows how disconnected you are from reality.
Keep thinking that miners can steal everyone's money in a hard fork, and that investors are going to line up to buy them back. LOL.
You still have not even paid attention to the fact that Core address hodlers do not get any Legacy tokens.
Yes they do. You're the fucking retard who assumes Segwit users =/= legacy users. Show me data that proves it. I certainly have coins in both address types and I'm sure many others do too.
Thus the air-drop is of Core tokens, not of Legacy tokens.
No, your shitcoin is literally a hard fork. It's a spinoff coin that removes consensus rules. The "Core" chain is the legacy chain and will keep chugging along like every day before.
In your hard fork, miners steal all anyone-can-spend outputs for themselves. The rest is airdropped to legacy address holders based on the original chain's outputs. This is a spinoff coin, just like any other. Didn't Jeff Garzik do a Bitcoin spinoff coin where they stole the Satoshi outputs? It's basically like that. LOL.
How is your shitcoin immutable?
Lol. You have no reading comprehension.
Which address format is the air-drop? Duh.
That was all explained in the Steemit posts which you do not even bother to read or youre reading comprehension is so low that you cant even grok the logic in what you read.
WTF does immutability have to do with address format?
Miners rolling back chains, removing consensus rules so they can steal money from users......that's all "immutable" to you.
"But using a P2SH address is heresy that most be punished for being an attack on Satoshi's immutable protocol!!!11!!1"
I can't believe I thought for a moment that you might have something interesting to say. I realize now you've built up this whole bizarre fantasy on the basis of zero evidence and incredibly fragile logic that's at complete odds with Bitcoin's game theoretical history.
I can't continue engaging with someone so delusional. There's just nothing to gain here. Good luck man, you're really going to need it.