I suspect that if HHampuz had just left the BTC untouched, in UTXO that Hhampuz has full control over, QS would have opened a similar thread raising suspicion on why Hhampuz was keeping funds in UTXO that he had full control over. Also, if Hhampuz moved the funds to any other address, QS would find some narrative to paint him in a bad light. And if Hhampuz came up with any plausible explanation, QS would construe that too, to fit his narrative.
No doubt about that. I'm old enough to remember how QS was claiming that Lauda not denying one of his (Quickseller's) hallucinations was proof of something or other.
Props to HH for not feeding the megatroll.
- Calling Lauda a pill addict
- Calling Vod a pedophile
- Accusing members of leaving fake trade feedback
- Calling Hhampuz a thief
There are plenty of other examples. QS has quite the track record of accusing people with zero evidence to back it up.