You all also refuse to even acknowledge just how much of the initial funds were returned to investors.
I don't refuse to acknowledge it, it's just not a particularly interesting point. You honored the terms of the agreement when it favored you personally (crypto prices were higher), and then renegged when it turned against you.
Again, just totally wrong. Btc prices went down from dec 2017 to dec 2018. I never stopped suddenly when it didn't favour me. I bought tokens right up to the end. Then we had to stop because the business had no money left because we were spending lots and using lots of initial funds to buy back tokens. The buybacks changed because it was necessary for the business to continue.
Again, you don't know anything that you are talking about and you don't know all the facts or how the business works or is working.
Notice you don't mention buying back now that btc is went up again.
"ven if you only scammed 0.01% of investors, it's still scamming and you don't get a cookie for not scamming the other 99.99%."
They were not scammed and if one person feels scammed but has no stake in the game then yes that is very relevant.
So you and your crew think it's OK to make things difficult for other investors to see a return on a lot of $ by labelling the site a scam because one person THINKS they have been scammed for a few $?
Use your head.