Now is 528 annoying considering how much you put in? Yes, of course. Is it a scam? Clearly not.
The site done terrible for a year. This is investing, there's risks.
No one's upset because the investment did bad. They're upset because it did bad because you scammed them by unilaterally changed the rules of the buyback to personally benefit you at the expense of investors. I think this is pretty clear to everyone, hence why so many independent people have given you negative trust.
This is where you are just totally wrong though and have no clue what you are talking about and shows a clear flaw with the trust system here.
No one who has left me negative trust put money in the ICO. None of them are investors and none of them have been scammed.
You all also refuse to even acknowledge just how much of the initial funds were returned to investors.
The fact is that almost all of the remaining investors, that represent >80% of the $ invested, are in a private Telegram group where we discuss daily the state of things and our future plans.
They are positive about the situation and don't think it's a scam.
So who is right? 80% of the actual money invested or 10 people on a forum who haven't invested a penny and don't know what they are talking about?
The ICO investors that cashed in their BKB tokens received BTC from funds that were supposed to be used for the bankroll so that in itself was a major reason the betking site was failing.
The only reason why the bankroll funds were used to buy-back BKB tokens was because it gave serial scammer Dean Nolan the ample opportunity and excuse to cash-in his own BKB tokens. He continued to siphon-off funds from the funds that were specifically to be used for "marketing, promotions, SEO, design development, server costs and legal" because it was easier to scam that way than steal directly from the bankroll.
Since no facts and figures have ever been released it is impossible to verify anything and it would be sheer lunacy to believe anything that serial scammer Dean Nolan spouts