You say her criticisms are a, "flow of personal opinion" and "hate," and then your response constitutes just that, a lack of substance and abundance of irrelevant, distracting insinuation.
I was asked for my viewpoint and I answered the question. No idea why you think that I should have wasted time on doing a rigorous analysis of her words and then on giving detailed answers to her concerns in the academic manner. I used a simple trick: I asked myself who she is and the answer made me write what you saw in my previous post. If you think her opinion is important then you are welcome to explain why.