Post
Topic
Board Meta
Re: A wave of bans: 400 yesterday, 300 the day before. What changed?
by
Quickseller
on 08/06/2019, 19:02:34 UTC
~

Holy macaroni... so your problem with me is that you think I'm lying to my spouse? Grin

If you weren't such a conniving weasel I'd be happy to provide invoices and source code to you but you'd just come up with a bunch of other lies. Not sure who you're implying to be the "scammer" who wrote the software (I guess tspacepilot would be a candidate as you likely hold a grudge against him). That's simply false. No other person touched the tools I built to report posts. You can keep calling it a bot if you want, I'm not going to try to explain what I'm actually doing, but I will keep calling you a lying asshat as you so thoroughly deserve it.

I have my doubts the person's junk science would allow him to sufficiently weed out these false positives

Feel free to ask theymos what the rate of false positives is in my reports, lying asshat.
You are a very dishonest person and would be very surprised if you were not being very dishonest and misleading to those who have a trust-based relationship with you on a regular basis.

It is transparently clear you are using a bot to detect plagiarized posts.  

You mentioned up thread that you manually review all the reports before submitting them, yet you say to ask theymos as to how many of your reports are inaccurate as evidence of the accuracy of your bot. These two items conflict with each other.


LoyceV — Perhaps you could filter out newbies from your list posted here and possibly anyone without merit in order to make the information more useful. Just a suggestion.