really? is the situation more worse than what bitcoin is in right now? most of the hashing power is concentrated into a handful of pools. Same with eos where it is centralized in with just 21 block producers that are getting 1.88 million a year for doing absolutely nothing?

Will it be any worse when compared to the case of facebook's worldcoin or libra or whatever the crap they're calling it? licensing each node for 10 million dollars and then concnetrating that power into one space?
See, decentralyzation is great, it should happen but as infrastructure decentralyzed infrastructure is very unreliable. Just factor in a 5 - 15 ms of latency in any decentralyzed network and you will see what I mean.
decentralyzation is prone to adoption, if people don't adopt, then the network will not mature and for that maturity to happen, it needs to be centra, to an extent, at first..