Please my fellow crypto friends I need answers badly about ICO and none ICO projects . my question to you all is
Why are projects with NO ICO always do better than the ones who were actually funded from ICO ? Projects with no funds or whatso ever should be the ones facing what ICO projects are facing excluding scams ones
I guess it would be this way. A company who has a capital or funds in the first place is more likely to succeed aince they dont want to waste their own money doing nothing. On the other hand, if a company does need ICO, then it has a possibility to close if they doesnt meet the required amount of investment.