The appearance of free forecasts could be immediately regarded as a red flag. This meant that there were no normal projects for candidates for the forecast.
But I do not remember what they would say specifically about rebranding, most likely the name will remain the same, only the direction of the project will change.
And if I am not mistaken at the end of last week, more detailed information should have appeared, but for now silence ...
I agree that adding a large number of low-grade projects was a bad marketing move. About rebranding said the administrator in the telegram Alexander, and I think that this is the right decision. Because a new direction is a new project.
They said we can see some results on the git hub, if someone understands something in this, you can look and tell us