I agree. However, excluding >95% of them (especially including the moderator) while educating the remainder seems sustainable to me (at least on DT1 level) which is what I will be doing.
Ok, you do the stick, I'll do the carrot (if I get back to DT1) by including a couple of folks there that I can reasonably determine to be trustworthy.
I've probably missed reading how @theymos selects the "random" 100, but if he wants to make the list truly random, he should go to random.org and use their
list randomiser.
https://www.random.org/lists/It would mean a small level of manual input but would certainly level the playing field.
I'm willing to bet a limb that theymos' randomiser is sufficiently random... dude's a hardcore bitcoiner.