⭐ Merited by fillippone (1)
Theymos ha aggiunto altre regole per evitare che il sistema venga usato nel modo sbagliato aka ti metto red trust perche' non mi stai simpatico o non fai come voglio io 
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5153344
Ma non dovrebbero mostrare anche i feedback untrusted neutri nella valutazione? Avrebbe più senso rispetto ai soli trust rilasciati dai DT.https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5153344
in realtà mostra anche si oppone, non sembra essere male già cosi comè, ci sono due varianti a seconda del caso (una se sei arancione e l'altra nel caso sei già rosso), questo commento mostra le dinamiche
This is why I checked my profile page early today, I saw something strange, but did not know what it is (I meant different format).
In addition, for this case:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=157669
By now, what I saw are:
- No matter how many supportive users to flag this account (5, 10, or 50) - with total supports are greater than opposition, with one oppostion for example, the flag status will be only displayed as Active / Inactive.
- There is no scale of flags: moderate, serious, extremely serious based on the ratio between Support/ Opposition.
What is difference between newsilike (Yellow Flag Box) and SafeDice (Red Flag Box)
They both get active flags, but one is in yellow flag, and another one is in red flag.
Their profile pages look different too:
Let me guess:
Yellow is for active flags.
Red: is for trust.
So, if someone got both red trust and active flag, their flag boxes will be displayed in Red.
Furthermore, Trust Warning is prioritised than flag:
If someone only get active flag: profile page will be shown with #, like newsilike.
But if someone get both red trust, and active flag: profile page will be shown with Trust Warning, there is no #, like SafeDice.
Lastly, what doest the meaning of smaller font size and grey color of supporters?
A scammer flag requires 3 more supporting users than opposing users to become active.
It means if someone received 4 scammer supporting flags, while only get 1 scammer opposing flag; the account will be flagged as potential scammer (based on your clarification above). But I have a curious that it means the flag system does not account for weight of user trust. Everyone has same weight with their flags, only one per user. Do I get it right?In addition, for this case:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=157669
By now, what I saw are:
- No matter how many supportive users to flag this account (5, 10, or 50) - with total supports are greater than opposition, with one oppostion for example, the flag status will be only displayed as Active / Inactive.
- There is no scale of flags: moderate, serious, extremely serious based on the ratio between Support/ Opposition.
What is difference between newsilike (Yellow Flag Box) and SafeDice (Red Flag Box)
They both get active flags, but one is in yellow flag, and another one is in red flag.
Their profile pages look different too:
Let me guess:
Yellow is for active flags.
Red: is for trust.
So, if someone got both red trust and active flag, their flag boxes will be displayed in Red.
Furthermore, Trust Warning is prioritised than flag:
If someone only get active flag: profile page will be shown with #, like newsilike.
But if someone get both red trust, and active flag: profile page will be shown with Trust Warning, there is no #, like SafeDice.
Lastly, what doest the meaning of smaller font size and grey color of supporters?
arriva molto tardi, perche certi personaggi hanno abusato di questa cosa chiedendo anche dei riscatti (siamo al ridicolo)
purtroppo il mondo e' pieno di imbecilli e se dai agli imbecilli un briciolo di potere, questi creano casini che tendono a infinito
purtroppo il mondo e' pieno di imbecilli e se dai agli imbecilli un briciolo di potere, questi creano casini che tendono a infinito
immagino
