Post
Topic
Board Meta
Re: Trust flags
by
TheNewAnon135246
on 12/06/2019, 13:31:16 UTC
I think it should be allowed to open a scammer flag against someone without personally being a victim if:

  • Victims have actually been scammed/lost money
  • The accusation contains enough factual evidence

Perhaps a rule could be added that a scam accusation needs to receive an x amount of merit before being able to add a scammer flag while not being a victim, showing that accusation has received enough support from the community.

EDIT:

An accusation like this:

There you go. I used August 2017 as the date. Flag link:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=52.