He did buy his account but I don't remember reading anything about him being an account seller.
Wrong title then and I oppose your opposition obviously.
Lauda, you know I respect you but you'll have to oppose my opposition to bill gator's flag as well. I've done business with him and never felt I was at risk of losing money. He's not a scammer, even if he bought his account. He's even a nice guy, for chrissakes. He doesn't deserve that flag. Many, many other members do, but not bill gator.
Kisses, sweet cat.
At Lauda I have yet to vote for or against bill gator.
But he has done business with me. In such a way that I trusted him.
he hosted gear for me for a while and could robbed the gear he did not. I would not have been able to be repaid so he was trustworthy with around 500 usd in gear.
I know he purchased an account and this is now considered a very bad thing to do. But years ago it was not a bad offense.
If he purchased an account and scammed with it I would agree with you.
So basically I think he is not the worst most untrustworthy guy.
I hate forum politics and I did not want to vote here. I still don't want to vote.
I will clearly explain why I don't want to vote.
I know bill gator's name I know where he lives
For the record
bill gator never stole from me
bill gator purchased the account years ago when it did not mean neg trust
bill gator did not steal from me when he had a chance to steal
SO I won't vote against him.
the issue here is not bill gator it is why were accounts allowed to be sold. and are still allowed to be sold.
without a sold tagit seems to me if you allow sold accounts and simply mark them as purchased it is enough to say account was sold on x date.
if you find an account was sold on the sneak and not marked as purchased it is a flag.
Making it a flag on a sold account would be much more correct if it was hidden
not making it a flag on a sold account would be much more correct.
a simple account sold on mm/dd/yy would end the entire issue