Probably because I was never on your trust list, but those that had me on their trust list were requested to exclude me, and not a peep of objection from any of you objecting here today was heard.
What then is the overlap of users? Surely you can comment on their hypocrisy.
As far as I know there is no overlap of individuals that got requests in both instances. There is however overlap in those that dismissed my arguments against Theymos requesting exclusions personally as if he did not also carry the weight of the admin. They were dismissive of or silent in response to the argument then, now they suddenly support the argument. This is not an argument based on principles, it is an argument based on personalities.
When exactly did this happen? I actually would have to re-read whatever happen before I could say anything.
Context would help.
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=917438.msg10072726#msg10072726Do you really think lauda gives one fuck about anything that happend before to you tec? he is trying to garner some spin here for his own ends
Theymos has eventually demonstrated he WANTS to provide the standards you were requesting. Let's not fuck it up at this stage.
This is a huge step forward in satoshi's end goal. Every person is treated equally and fairly according to a set of transparent RULES.
This is what the trust system should be. You can prove or demonstrate strongly someone is a scammer then they get a scam tag. Anyone who wants to use red trust for their OWN purposes or to silence whistle blowing have NO place in positions of trust.