This appears to be a vindictive attack on QS merely because he has presented some observable instances that cast suchmoon, and suchmoons possible alt lauda in a bad light.
I would not recommend to any reader that they endorse this action against QS without first examining this page which demonstrates the escrow attempt by suchmoons friends/alt lauda and his pals which QS was first to warn the board about.
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5153864.0Also regarding another observable instance QS revealed with suchmoons other friend hhampuz looking like he perhaps stole 0.5btc
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5147938.0Compared to suchmoons other friends/alts we do no think you should endorse any action against QS without endorsing action against lauda and hhmpuz
This is merely a thread to try to discredit his legitimate criticism of them and the observable instances he provided for the board.
Things must be taken in context. Also motive should be a consideration. We see that when you consider both of these if lauda and hhampuz are not flagged then QS should not be either.
This is a thread about QS, can you stay on topic please. Hhampuz, Lauda & anybody else you choose to bitch about is off topic.
I dont want to have to start reporting posts.
Thanks in advance.
WRONG - this is a vindictive thread from a clearly double standards back stabbing untrustworthy member. The reader needs to clearly have access to all the observable instances so they can make the optimal decision of whether to support or deny the flag.
If i say people are vindictive, have an ulterior motive and they have double standards the reader deserves to have access to the observable instances to know these are not false accusations.
To support disciplinary action one must have context to judge the CORRECT SUITABLE action is being taken. NO one rule for my friends one rule for everyone else. WE WANT THINGS FAIR AND CONSISTENT - NO MORE DOUBLE STANDARDS
The reader should also be privy to this observable instance
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5136759.0Notice the person meriting suchmoons motivated attack? yes the person that has admitted he is simply the mouth piece LAUDA bullies around. Of course he will be doing his best to deprive the reader of the optimal level of back ground information to be able to decide optimally how to vote on QS flag.
If you allow double standards on this board then freedom of speech is vulnerable. If you can be punished for actions a gang gets away with it is all over here. Punish one person then punish all persons that meet the same threshold of apparent untrustworthy behavior.
This is suggesting selective punishment for lesser crimes by QS than suchmoons friends/alts are guilty of. NOT APPROPRIATE.