Great, so you admit that this is not only based on his opinion, which is expressly prohibited, but this is also very likely retaliatory.
No, I don't, I have stated numerous times what specific facts this is based on. If you wanna have the last say - go ahead. I won't entertain this circular word play anymore.
Feel free to report me to admistration too for some mailing list treatment.
Sorry, but you are the one running in circles. If it is valid to flag people for making an accusation, all we have is the same broken system we had before where the trust system is openly used as a tool of retaliation for punishing users for making reports against certain users. I believe this is intentionally designed to subvert the intent of the system. The system is not here for you to punish people for saying things you don't like, it is here to protect people from fraud and theft. You know this, but you like other mall cops can't cope with your loss of dictatorial control and are clinging to it with every ounce of semantics and twisted logic you can muster.