Your claim was "Either you are controlling both accounts or know the suspect and are working together to gain an advantage."
It's clear that I'm not controlling both accounts, as the owner of the second account has come forward and we are both well-known and thus neither of our identities is fake.
So, the other possibility remains: collusion, that we have been working together to gain an advantage.
To that end, our login times, IPs and individual play patterns are irrelevant.
The onus is on you to show that our play patterns have deviated when playing in the same table compared to when playing in different tables.
You have done nothing of the sort, so there is no basis for the accusation of gaining an advantage.

Hence, your claim is baseless. You have no reasonable basis for the assumption of collusion, and thus you are not entitled to the money in the account.
Moreover, this claim puts me at risk of reputational damage, as a person teaching others for a living. If you do not withdraw these unfounded claims, I will be forced to pursue reparations.

Attached is a point by point reply to your "evidence" document.
https://drive.google.com/open?id=1fbQ0wXlWytBk53keNE-Njf95_yyFGBYg

Thanks,
Uri