Lets try to keep the Meta drama to a minimum. Obviously, off-topicness happens here, and the trust/flag stuff is tangentially related to various degrees, but there are better places to litigate all of that.
It has nothing to do with Meta any more; only price-related entities and users related to this section. It's a hand-picked list after all. No new posts will be created, the existing post will be occasionally incorporated into a new post as a side-note which is perfectly fair IMO.
You're going too far, Lauda, if you advise the good people of this thread to defy theymos or to sign contract-flags that aren't air-tight.
Incorrect. I don't advise anyone to do anything. I created a list of dangerous individuals and/or scammers and ask people to support flags that they want to. I support all of them and strongly believe that theymoses judgement has been contaminated (possible legal pressure, pressure by the domain owner, etc.). You don't have to support those that you do not want to. It's important that the list is there and protects both newbies and the price.

I have reworded the post as it seems that you and others are scared of big-bad-theymos. FYI: The contractual flag on Roger Ver is correct; the one on BSV is debatable.
The remaining flags are all within the guidelines. Gathering support for flags as a side-note is on-topic
everywhere.
But exactly as infofront says keep it minimum in here, cause this is the finest hangout thread of the entire forum with a lot of regular good guys/members that share some cool on as off topic stuff that we all can appriciate......
I'm trying to keep it at a minimum but people keep responding to it. That's not the intended behaviour of creating a note with a quote. Back to the price with y'all.
