Re: Hhampuz embezzling signature campaign funds from BestMixer
The repayment happened either directly or indirectly with BestMixer money meaning that he may have run the specific inputs through one or more mixers before repaying the loan and he may have used BestMixers money to pay other bills/expenses and as a result was able to use other inputs to repay the loan that he would have otherwise used to pay those bills.
Ok, let's assume what you're saying is right and again, Hhampuz used BestMixer's money and circulated in such a way that the coins were sent to DarkStar_ through a mixer, any evidence on that? Can you prove that the addresses Hhampuz sent back the coins to, belongs to Chipmixer? And btw, as you already know too much about him, I guess you're falling for Hhampuz generally. <3
Quote
I dont think he would have taken the loan if he knew about BestMixer closing in advance. Others bringing this up are trying to create a distraction.
Please decide to whether you're trying to accuse him of his "SCAM* or complimenting him side by side.
Quote
Quote
Well, as you said you've got txid, why are you crossing your own words (by putting those IDs in suspense) and saying that he purchased Chips from Chipmixer which ended (specifically, landed) to DarkStar's address/es? You should really come up with great evidence to prove him guilty, else you're again trying to harm "just another guy's" reputation here.
I am not sure what you mean here. There is evidence that Hhampuz *had a loan outstanding as of when BestMixer closed down.
*moved the money belonging to BestMixer to a mixer (chipmixer) immediately after BestMixer closed.
There is also evidence that Hhampuz earns his living from his business here and as such he cannot use all of his earnings to repay any loan he takes out. He must use some of his earnings to pay for things like rent, food, utilities and other bills he may have.
Once again I'd like to reiterate here that there are no valid evidences which prove your accusations to be correct and you're just shooting arrows in the dark. Assumptions can't help you ruin anybody's reputation.
Quote
Quote
True, people here can easily use more than 10s of 100s of addresses every single day, so it's not really easy for anyone to "assume" about anybody's spends and earnings here.
How wicked is it QS when you first claim things like you know everything and then speak about assumptions. Assumptions are not gonna work but proofs, to let you make us believe that what you're saying is actually true. I've not personal grudges with you whatsoever, but I guess we need some more drama here eh!
See above. The specific fact set that can be proven will allow a reasonable person to conclude that Hhampuz stole money for his personal use. How wicked is it QS when you first claim things like you know everything and then speak about assumptions. Assumptions are not gonna work but proofs, to let you make us believe that what you're saying is actually true. I've not personal grudges with you whatsoever, but I guess we need some more drama here eh!
So, guess I've made up my mind on him not to be guilty?
Maybe, but this is not something of a partial decision and I don't have any personal issues with you as well.
About being reasonable to come to any conclusions, I guess I'm too expensive to be able to reach one.