I would point out that it is pretty standard for the default response to a scam accusation is to leave negative trust until a response is given.
Let us know when you have a viable scam accusation then, with facts and proof and stuff. So far all we can see is just some speculation based on your assumption that Hhampuz was not authorized to move the funds. There is no plausible reason to think that way. He was entrusted with far larger amounts even in that same campaign. He can surely be trusted to handle the remaining 0.5 BTC the way he's supposed to, whether it needs to be returned to BestMixer, or held for a while, or converted to fiat, or if that's his compensation or perhaps half a dozen other possible reasons.
Embezzlement wouldn't be the first thought for a reasonable observer but for you it's the only thought. Something's seriously wrong with the way you're put together. If you directed this much effort into finding a job you could be doing much better than you did with the Livecoin signature.
Hold on suchmoon. How about you tell your pals to stick to the SAME super strict standards for making allegations? they just tell outright lies. QS's case seems plausible and undeniable in certain respects.
Please stop pushing double standards and moving the goal posts to suit you and your friends.
This latest action by hhampuz along with his support for doxing a forum treasurer would be grounds enough for red trust by your pals.
That's without him refusing to provide a transparent set of rules and guidelines to apply equally to all members for his campaigns so we can see he is not gaming his position and acting in a corrupt manner.
Now he is trust abusing other members on super weak sauce grounds likely trying to discourage others for speaking up.
This all looks like behavior projects will seek to distance themselves from. We will be raising these observable instances with them to get their own comments.