Not sure at all it can be seen as "High-Risk"
I believe the positive trust left here is both counter--productive and a bit childish, it simply makes no sense and makes less sense after this
I personally wouldn't lend to him either
lemipawa
borrowed 0.05BTC from shasan a while back. I wouldn't have lent to them either, but I'm not going to leave a negative trust for that.
Hypothetically, how many out of 10, 0.05
BTC no collateral loans from accounts without positive trust & trading history would
probably get paid back?
Id say theres a high % some wouldnt so my reasoning for the neg is to warn potential lenders.
This has been done to death now though, Im not posting in this thread again now.