sorry to say but DZ has been a disappointment for me as a whole experience now.
Woah, I'm sorry that you've had a bad experience but I've had nothing to do with the failure of Black Arrow to deliver in February (or the refund process I can't control), and everything to do with helping make this GB Round available in the first place.
Please note that I set up the co-op so that like minded miners could team up to get us this type of volume pricing and provide services to fellow miners at rock bottom prices. Remember that there NO better complete deals available in the timeframe when R17 was available. Nada.
I put up a shitton of money and BTC to even set up this co-op in the first place (John K. is still holding 1.14 AM shares of mine that were a security collateral for the first miner payouts when I was a noob, & I'd like to get back one day) and to defend the will of the supermajority by paying out of pocket to pursue a lawsuit vs. HF for Rounds 1-4, without asking for co-op funds for this.
I was the very first GB Coordinator here to ever offer "at-cost" or even "below cost" GB shares, and the first to introduce true team mining to the GB forum, where work tasks are subdivided so that 1 single person doesn't burn out, so I would greatly appreciate the distinction between the DZMC disappointing you, and me, the guy that's been paying to work for the co-op for free for the last 7 months to help give you these rock bottom prices.
i didnt write DZ intending you, for me DZ and DZMC was synonomous but you have a fair point so let me say it again.
correction: DZMC has been a disappointment for me as a whole experience.
i like your approach to things and can emphatize with you. I have no doubt you have done a great job. My only feedback will be not to stop the progress and "mentally retire" on DZMC.
I mean out of all i wrote, you took out that sentence, became a bit defensive about it and didnt even inquire about my comments on thomas's attitude.
there is a huge gap between your style, thomas and bobsag whatever's style and overall commitments.
i am assuming they are both getting their share and payment on this so they are being paid for what they do. so thomas's style and replies are not justifiable at all. he cant keep this bitchiness (excuse my language) in every single reply. i kept trying to be nice just to see if he would be like this and yes he was the same.
would you agree with me when i say
- if you are at thomas's position you need to answer questions
-you need to answer them clearly
- you need to answer them politely
- if you dont want to get too many questions then do your job and put a f.ing announcement to the site
- when the whole website is moving at least tell people what is going on, send them a mail or something.
- i dont think 1000s of people would like to see out of the blue one day that the site changed faces and logins dontwork anymore
- all in all, if this is thomas's job, then he should just shut up and do it and not act like a b.tch with sand in her v.gina
sorry my intention is not to offend anyone but sometimes it is hard to keep your calm
i hope you take these as feedback and this doesnt end up like one of those never ending forum fights (if so i wont be replying for sure)