xtraelv
You have edited your post. I continue:
You have edited your post. I continue:
My post was edited well before you made your post.
1.) In the first post, I showed big donors of merit for Smart man. Why are they all banned for plagiarism/another abuse and sent merits to users banned for plagiarism/another abuse? Can there be so many coincidences?
Here is another scheme of merit flow. Please note that most users are also banned for plagiarism. You can check it through BPIP.
Most of the users who wrote in the Smart man topic either is on this scheme or are directly connected with it. Again coincidences?
Here is another scheme of merit flow. Please note that most users are also banned for plagiarism. You can check it through BPIP.
Most of the users who wrote in the Smart man topic either is on this scheme or are directly connected with it. Again coincidences?
In the absence of concrete proof it is a co-incidence. It doesn't make it untrue. It makes it unproven.
When I described in detail who sent merit, where, it is not specific data that are proof? I showed a lot of abusers who act on one pattern. This is specific data that is evidence of abuse.
2.) Just check his topic. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2058283.0 Many examples 1 2 3 etc.
Note in the thread a lot of dialogs like:
- Wrote to you in PM.
-Thank you, answered, we will work.
-Good! I agree it.
- Fine, I'm waiting.
-I sent you new documentation.
-Got it, work.
Very funny, do real customers behave like this?
Note in the thread a lot of dialogs like:
- Wrote to you in PM.
-Thank you, answered, we will work.
-Good! I agree it.
- Fine, I'm waiting.
-I sent you new documentation.
-Got it, work.
Very funny, do real customers behave like this?
This is common shitposter behavior. It is dealt with by reporting the post to the moderator and getting it deleted and if the user does it enough times they get banned.
Where is the proven link to Smart man ?
Without concrete proof it is a mere allegation. While some people may place feedback based on allegations. Most won't.
Hiring in bumping service he is listed on the Merit flow diagram above.
MrBoston 3/25/2018 9:48:00 PM password changed 5/14/2019 9:52:40 PM woke up connected to the Merit flow diagram above
Fixxer767 3/25/2018 10:20:35 PM password changed 5/12/2019 1:30:10 AM woke up
Jeronimo78 3/18/2018 4:13:10 PM password changed 5/9/2019 8:29:33 AM woke up banned, connected to the Merit flow diagram above
pradobo banned, he is listed on the Merit flow diagram above.
BlackAndBlack connected to the Merit flow diagram above
Alex6562 banned, connected to the Merit flow diagram above
etc.
This is not the standard behavior of shitposters to up someone else's thread with positive comments and impersonate customers.
3.)
I have seen no proof that Smart man is the instigator of the scam rather than a misguided investor or bounty manager.
You do not need to do any research. Smart man himself writes that he worked with this project and that he learned that this project was scam. But he did not warn anyone about this.Is this not complicity in crime?
4.)
Quote
4.) Ha ha. There is no evidence that the spam service produces spam? OK.
Calling something a spam service is not evidence of spam. It is circular logic.
Evidence of these actions is in the first message.