Waiting for a response from the team. Some controversial moments I so understand they decided, but still something that remained
Contraversional moments? Is there something to be cautious about?
As the above has been fairly emotional person, so far no changes have been made in the white paper.
His accusations look... well, disturbing to say the least. But there is something strange about them. AFAIK bitcointalk is very quick about pinning scam warnings on suspicious messages. Sometimes there is no need in solid proofs. Right here there is no warnings pinned and OPs trust isn't red, so there's these accusations probably are not so solid as they look.
Did developers answer something on these accusations?
Its too easy to say scam and leave the thread after it. Investors and community need proofs to this words.