Hello!
1. I knew that such a day would come, morally I am ready for any checks. I declare: - there are no abuses in my actions.
I have never sold merit.
I have never engaged in the exchange of merit by agreement.
I did not provide benefits in the activities of DT and did not pursue anyone, without good reason.
I did not buy, did not sell, and did not accept as a gift forum accounts.
Accounts created by me, I have no other accounts.
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1202061https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=2252498https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=2259013I can prove that I created the
chimk account, for this I need to open some personal data. I am ready to do this in personal correspondence with administrators.
I do not use other accounts.
2. This accusation of
Smart man was published 3 times.
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5105985.
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5105163.msg49583617#msg49583617https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5105163.msg51398628#msg51398628Smart man gave explanations
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5105163.msg51411806#msg51411806https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5105163.msg51412195#msg51412195https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5105163.msg51412275#msg51412275 I read a lot of forum, sometimes it leads to a comparison of suspicious facts, it takes a lot of time. I first responded on June 10, 2019. I studied this case, read the Smart man's answer, read the opinions of other participants in the discussion, and did not see evidence that the
Smart man is detrimental to users or the forum. I have stated my position several times. There is not enough evidence of fraud to negatively assess the trust of this user.
I was charged with protecting the service and in the conflict of interest. In this post,
KTChampions lied twice. I do not advertise or defend the service.
Smart man is not my friend, I am not familiar with it.
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5105163.msg51419663#msg51419663http://archive.md/VQtc1User
Smart man does not have marks for this episode, from other users. I think everyone understands that my opinion cannot have such an effect. Moreover, I started to participate in the discussion only on June 10, 2019.
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=1090672Other cases involving Smart man, I have not studied.
3 Another slander about me.
And chimik has an alt which is connected with a set of merit abusers.
Polkeins 4/6/2018 3:49:26 PM password reset via email
7/9/2018 6:24:31 AM password changed
8/9/2018 6:55:31 PM password changed
chimk 4/16/2018 8:44:51 PM password reset via email
8/9/2018 9:55:07 PM password changed
This is slander. Please verify this charge, if possible. password reset in April on different dates? More stupid accusations I have not met. Changing the password matched in numbers, but did not coincide in time. Maybe there is someone else who changed the password 8/9/2018? This method of accusations can be a scenario for future attacks, now I will take countermeasures.
4. Merit
Smart man.
For the first time I awarded him the merits of 2/25/2019 and 3/29/2019
for a little investigation into the bounty. Before that, he received a lot of merit without my participation. Examples:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=3051995.msg31419121#msg3141912148 merit
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=3066618.msg31593227#msg3159322745 merit
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=3190976.msg33070682#msg3307068228 merit
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=3369080.msg35298458#msg3529845817 merit.
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2891755.msg29729057#msg2972905712 merit
After this,
Smart man began to write more about bitcoin and I liked that the number of content posts on btc increased. I began to award him more merit. The increase in outgoing merits from the Smart man also contributed to this, earlier he was less willing to distribute outgoing merits.
5.
This model of behavior did not change even when two DT
kzv (Hero member, DT-1),
MaoChao (Legendary, DT-1) members expressed the opinion that the available evidence directly speaks about hiring in a bumping service and offering a bumping service.
The only change that happened -
Chimik excluded
kzv from his trusted list and added him to the list of users whom he does not trust!
Surprisingly, these two members of DT, did not leave a mark in the Smart mans trust. I hope they understand that nobody restricts them in this right.
I removed
kzv from the list of trust much earlier, I did not like its list of trust, in particular, there was
amaclin1. We discussed this with him in personal correspondence.
~ kzv I put, after
kzv wanted to include
fxpc in my list, which I consider to be a bitcoin hater, a troll, I consider him a dangerous person, I got the impression that this is an unbalanced person with problems in the psyche, he often offends users and I I do not trust him. I also do not understand the
kzv logic on some issues related to DT. I gradually formed the opinion that at the moment he is not ready for this work and to trust him DT, this is a bad service to him and the forum. I have no other complaints about
kzv, I consider it a useful user. I often gave him merit for his contribution to the development of the forum and to maintain the section of CODERS, this is an act of trust.
This is another little detail of distorting the facts.
6. I give some examples to understand the prehistory. There are many examples, this is a large amount. In the Russian section, this situation is known.
In the Russian section, I wrote that I consider the activities of fxpc and KTChampions harmful for the forum. I did not make direct threats in changing the trust.
But I made a lot of complaints about them to moderators, this can be seen in the statistics of the reports. For example,
I made a lot of reports in the topic Analytics, analysis, forecasts. I made a lot of reports on the Lightning Network. Moderators have attached this topic in the section, at my request
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1152660.msg30028849#msg30028849and I promised that we will maintain cleanliness in this topic.
In the topic of high activity
KTChampions, fxpc, apxu (amaclin1).
Off top rudely took on such a scale that one of the most active and experienced users wanted to stop supporting the Lightning Network theme.
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2897133.msg50233157#msg50233157And I wrote to him publicly that these people are trying to achieve just that, the cessation of any activity in the development of BTC.
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2897133.msg50236602#msg50236602Another example of a smart man creates a bitcoin theme.
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5150471.0In the topic of high activity
KTChampions, fxpc, apxu (amaclin1)KTChampions is trying to prove that the
BTC is a pyramid, calls BTC enthusiasts sectarians. fxpc rude to users, apxu (amaclin1) criticizes the technical side of the
BTC.
http://archive.md/zVyA8Example number 3 in the topic
Bitcoin vs Gold vs Fiat I posted a link to the video that Bitcoin is more convenient than gold, I wrote that this video is gaining popularity.
KTChampions wrote that this did not correspond to reality and accused me of distorting facts,
fxpc supported him in an insulting form, after which I gave evidence of the popularity of this video.
http://archive.md/YRXEE#selection-465.4-465.297.
There is definitely an issue of many permabanned users getting merit. I think the main issue is that plagiarism is hard to detect and often fools the reader into believing that it is a good quality post.
Permabanned user getting merit doesn't mean that merit was sent for e.g. plagiarised posts. tvplus006 and lovesmayfamilis are notable scam researchers and got a lot of merits for that work. Later turned out to have plagiarised in the past.
https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=lovesmayfamilishttps://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=tvplus006I believe chimk ended up at the top of the list mainly because of users like that, and not because of lack of due diligence in sending merits, let alone
corruption.
You are absolutely right. I spend a lot of time checking texts and user profiles. I have folders in which already verified information is contained and there are many open cases. It is easy to check the text for plagiarism; it is difficult to check the entire profile for plagiarism. Every day, you need to consider dozens of applicants. In addition, I wrote several times in the Russian section about the need for everyone to be attentive to the observance of rule No. 33. I was sure that applicants for the DT1 list would not have plagiarism in their profile. I was sure that they were ready for the checks, and was very surprised when I learned that they have plagiarism, so I took it as a betrayal.
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5141782.msg50995549#msg50995549https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=lovesmayfamilishttps://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=tvplus006you can add to them
https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=WhiteManWhite member DT1 received merit
https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=FapToBbly active participant and BTC supporter
https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=markiz73 active member supporting the section MINERS.
They all deserved merit and looked reliable, I often check profiles, but there is not enough time for everyone. It is especially difficult to find plagiarism in another language. And I did not support anyone in appeals, because everyone knew about the responsibility for plagiarism. And everyone saw this list in which the number of blocked for plagiarism is greater.
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=4588431.0But this does not mean that I disclaim responsibility for my mistakes.
I apologize to the administrator for the poor statistics in this period, who entrusted me with helping the forum, as well as the entire community.
The other day I will write about it separately, I will indicate how I am guided in the distribution of merit and with what difficulties I encounter.
8. Is there corruption in the Russian section? I think that there is. I have some suspicions, I conducted several investigations. But I do not have enough evidence to state this publicly. Are there any improvements in the Russian section? Of course, there are major improvements. Thanks to those who found the opportunity to participate in the consideration of the charges.
I did a lot of work a few days, came home yesterday, today wrote this message, which allowed me to understand the importance of what I was doing. The growth of bitcoin brings pain to some people))) they need to buy some soothing medicines. Now I have to go to bed, its already morning.
P.S. Sorry for the mistakes, I wrote and translated all night.
Edit:changed the design item number 3