1) I fail to see the direct correlation between tema and Total corruption in Russian local involving DTs.
If you have a problem with Tema then open a thread in reputation about it.
If you have a problem with Tema then open a thread in reputation about it.
1.) Perhaps you will see a correlation when you analyze a lot of individual cases (as i do). But you refuse to give a specific answer, even about one user tema.
2) Already answered in detail. Read my previous responses.
2.) Please, give me a direct link to this answer.3) Already answered in detail. Read my previous responses.
3.) Please, give me a direct link to this answer.4) Already answered in detail. Read my previous responses.
4.) Please, give me a direct link to this answer.If you want to discuss individual transgressions then there is the reputation board for that.
Of course, I will do it, but here I want to show the general situation that is shaping up due to a combination of individual violations of many users.What I have found over time is that there are a number of relatively new users that come to the forum and decide that they are self appointed judge, jury and executioner and like a zealot have a strict and uncompromising view of the world. Everyone else is wrong and they are right.
Oh 
~
At the moment I do not understand the arguments of taikuri13 and chimk, who have written about the situation with the Smart man
It is absolutely obvious from the evidence that the Smart man recruited people to provide bumping / shilling services for projects. And there seems to be no doubt that bumping services harm forum users, the reasons have been repeatedly mentioned in this topic.
~
MaoChao is not new user, zealot etc.At the moment I do not understand the arguments of taikuri13 and chimk, who have written about the situation with the Smart man
It is absolutely obvious from the evidence that the Smart man recruited people to provide bumping / shilling services for projects. And there seems to be no doubt that bumping services harm forum users, the reasons have been repeatedly mentioned in this topic.
~
There are a number of DTs that in the past have taken uncompromising views on some of these issues. Several of them have been removed or publicly reprimanded for taking such uncompromising views.
This is your feedback.
I showed that Smart man is a account farmer and showed some of his alts.
It is ok?
Wow! 
What a great post! How many arguments!
So... After you defended the scamer, you cant say anything smarter than I don't know? Even after I showed specific facts and you just have to think about them?
What a great post! How many arguments!
So... After you defended the scamer, you cant say anything smarter than I don't know? Even after I showed specific facts and you just have to think about them?
I didn't say, "I don't know." I said I couldn't say "yes" for sure because of the lack of evidence. Without hard evidence this is just your guess. Such assumptions can be made as much as you like with respect to any forum user. Please also note that I am not defending Smart man. If you had incontrovertible evidence that Smart man is abusing something, I would support you.
1.) What can you say about bumping (taking into account proofs and the opinion of Mao Chao)?
2.) What about alts of Smart man?