Well, there is a nice blog post from a random person that is praising Socrates and stating "See you in Orlando". The sales pitch has started for the next WEC. The posts states that they were amazed by the the move up in gold after resistance was broken. This person must be completely new to trading because that is what prices do when there is a technical break out. A super computer is not needed to tell you that, but rather one line on a chart connecting the highs. Oh my!
https://www.armstrongeconomics.com/markets-by-sector/precious-metals/gold/socrates-gold/ Socrates & Gold
Blog/Gold
Posted Jun 24, 2019 by Martin Armstrong
COMMENT: Mr. Armstrong; I want to salute you on creating Socrates. Its forecast on gold was remarkable. When gold was starting to breakout on May 31, Socrates wrote concerning your breakout points:
We did close below the previous sessions Intraday Projected Breakout Resistance indicator which was 129370 settling at 129240 gesturing that the market is not in a breakout mode at that precise moment. The current Projected Breakout Resistance for this session was 129740 which we have now closed above suggesting the market is starting to possibly breakout to the upside if it can be maintain in the next trading session. The Projected Breakout Resistance indicator for the next session will be 132023.
The next day closed at 1327 and off it ran. It is amazing how the computer explains these moves in advance.
See you in Orlando
HP
REPLY: This is my objective. To have a computer write the analysis and you know there is no human bias involved one way or another. Just call it by the numbers without all the nonsense. Socrates now covers more than 1,000 instruments around the world every day. There are not enough analysis in the world to write so many reports every day. This is the way to the future. Objective analysis without the human bias.
Ohhhhhh Marty you are so great... and I thought that all of his readers were still waiting for Gold to hit under $1000

The infallible Socrates system is beyond awesome!
"Objective analysis without the human bias."
Which is really funny, because Armstrong regularly writes as a sensationalist.