Post
Topic
Board Русский (Russian)
Merits 5 from 5 users
Re: Наказание участников форума за плагиат
by
DIKUL
on 26/06/2019, 07:41:49 UTC
⭐ Merited by xandry (1) ,taikuri13 (1) ,Xal0lex (1) ,madnessteat (1) ,Coin-1 (1)
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=2560321
MrFreeRoMan

https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=MrFreeRoMan
Этот ресурс показывает, что Autoban user

В списках Xal0lex-а его нет, если я правильно понимаю, то забанен он был в английской части форума.

Конечно я могу ошибаться, так как не читал его профиль полностью, но этот участник был заметен и у него были хорошие темы.
Может быть это "какое-то уклонение" или причина - как у всех?

Это было уклонение от бана:


This user not only used the same social networks, but even the same ETH address:

I don't get any token in my account! Or, if I have an unverified account, don't get them?



#Proof of Authentication

1.) Bitcointalk username: MrDongyy
2.) Telegram username: @MrDongyy
3.) ETH wallet address :  0x06Dc0CBF44EED256C5975210095be703504a4541
4.) Join Twitter/Facebook Campaign

I have always indicated references to sources, and I don’t need someone else's fame!

Ban evader. Your account MrDongyy has been banned last year as per BPIP
Code:
10/28/2018 9:04:19 PM Changed to Archived status Autoban user

Proof:

Week #14 (22.10-28.10)
Twitter
Tweet
1 https://twitter.com/MrFreeRoMan/status/1054761643756929024

Week #14 (22.10-28.10)
Facebook
Post
1 https://www.facebook.com/romasaf/posts/1940518076036731

Profile Link: https://www.facebook.com/romasaf

Profile Link: https://twitter.com/MrFreeRoMan

You're one of the most merited member from the forum but ban evasion is one of serious violation you did, I can't still find the reason of the ban but I guess it's for sure a plagiarized content.

Code:
5/4/2019 12:00:10 AM Award - Merit Most Merited (6) on 2019/05/03

И плагиат нашелся:

I have always indicated references to sources, and I don’t need someone else's fame!

Not always.

Copy:
I have some other pictures...
But the Same news

https://i.imgur.com/H59EYlt.png
https://twitter.com/ehtelescope
Their existence was predicted by more General scientific theories (for the first time — at the end of the XVIII century) and since then repeatedly confirmed by calculations. But scientists did not have "material evidence" — and now they do.
Original:
Their existence was predicted by more general scientific theories (for the first time — at the end of the 18th century) and since then is repeatedly confirmed with calculations. But scientists had no "material evidences" — and now is.

A link to Twitter is not a link to the source.