It appears that xtraelv, suchmoon, LFC_Bitcoin, marlboroza are all abusing their positions in opposing flag #292 that is clearly valid based solely on evidence admitted to by the accused.
All of the above should be blacklisted from DT1/2
All of the above should be blacklisted from DT1/2
Oh quicksy.. how many threads do you want to spam with this?
For once and all, the flag says:
Quote
SeW900 alleges: bob123 violated a casual or implied agreement, resulting in damages [...]
I don't want to start arguing whether we had an agreement or not.
I also don't want to start arguing again whether the account seller got damage.
I have answered that in the 2 other threads already.
But.. IF i violated an agreement and IF the account seller got monetary damage because i tagged his accounts as untrustworthy:
The 'damage' has not been done because of violation.
Based on this (which is enough already), and the fact that 'damage' and 'violation of agreement' can't bee seen as such.. the flag absolutely is inappropriate.