It appears that xtraelv, suchmoon, LFC_Bitcoin, marlboroza are all abusing their positions in opposing flag #292 that is clearly valid based solely on evidence admitted to by the accused.
All of the above should be blacklisted from DT1/2
While I agree with you, what bob did was unethical but since his actions revealed a scammer who was trying to sell an account which he didn't originally own or paid for, it doesn't matter how and why Bob shared these information with us.
He (
SeW900) was selling a
hacked account (
zackie) which
overrides Bob's unethical actions. I am not sure if he deserves a flag even if the account wasn't hacked, I would just ignore the flag probably but not now. Nack.
You know what I think now?
I think zackie should create a flag for SeW900 for hacking and selling his account.
SeW900 deserves a red flag all around his forehead. I guess I'll just PM him.
While I wholeheartedly support an investigation on SeW900 and the hacked account matter, they are two unrelated instances. You don't get free license to damage others because they committed some other offense. The account being hacked wasn't brought up until 2 days after the fact, it did not have any bearing on Bob's initial actions which I'm calling scamming.
Its a really bad road to travel if we start justifying people's actions based on perceived problems with the other people. Maybe tomorrow it'll be cool to scam investors in ICOs since they are perpetuating what some perceive as dishonest investments. Maybe we can all decide its ok to rip off Bitcoin Cash users because we don't support their fork.