1miau is observably either:

1. stupid

or

2. dishonest.

or

3. Unable to comprehend English to a standard where he could apply merit to the correct posts.



We notice he left FAKE negative feedback on our account.

The feedback is OBSERVABLY INCORRECT. We asked Hhampuz to answer some valid and important questions. We provided the observable instances which provided a STRONG case as a basis for each of the VALID QUESTIONS, those instances were not disputed or refuted by either HHampuz or any other person on that thread.

If this fool 1miau believes presenting observable instances and asking questions about them (when they are dealing with the finances of project and members) makes you a scammer, then he is either a moron or dishonest or as we say incapable of comprehending English to a standard required of a merit source.  Those observable instances still stand and NONE of them have been debunked and some are undeniable evidence of wrong doing.

Hhampuz answered that - he did not knowingly hire some of those members as they were hired directly by the project. However he did REFUSE to be transparent regarding the standards and thresholds for his hiring and firing members on his sig campaigns. We believe this is not how campaign managers should behave. All members should be in a transparent and equal manner.

We strongly oppose his merit source application. The noob seems to have appeared from nowhere and has suddenly arrived on DT and now asking for merit source too?

No thanks.

I mean if idiots like 1miau say " we will not believe a word you say" when you have only presented observable instances and asked questions relating to them?? then what sort of miscreant are we dealing with. How can it be trusted to allocate merit?? that's his basis for this comment? LOL